This is in comparison to other file formats which have well agree approaches to metadata storage. The reason for this is that until recently the approaches to tagging WAV files were not that well agreed. Other than the storage size requirement for all those uncompressed, lossless files, the main cost of using WAV has traditionally been that management of a WAV library is much harder. To the really obsessive fastidious audiophile, the fact that it is uncompressed also means less work for the processor and therefore, so they say, less electrical interference that may affect playback quality. To the audiophile, the fact that the audio stream is lossless is extremely important it means there has been no loss of data in the process of transferring from the source material (CD, studio master) to the WAV. WAV is, typically, a container format containing uncompressed, lossless audio data. WAVs have always been valued by the audiophile. Now, though, WAV is shaking off its rather onerous (in terms of management) reputation. It's been around for twenty-five years and it remains popular, despite shortcomings when it comes to music library management. When it comes to music file formats, WAV is the venerable grandfather to the new kids on the block. The basic structure of the user interface is similar though, so I'm keeping these old pages around in case they still contain useful information. This post may contain old screenshots of bliss which has been replaced by a new design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |